Mature eucalyptus forest with peeling bark and dappled understorey light
Species

Eucalyptus: Controversial Giant, Essential Keystone

Why eucalyptus is not one tree but over 700 species — an irreplaceable keystone in Australian ecosystems but a source of ecological damage when planted as monocultures elsewhere.

By Arborpedia Team·November 10, 2025

Not One Tree: 700 Species of Diversity

When people say "eucalyptus," they typically imagine a single type of tree — tall, grey-barked, pungent with essential oil. In reality, the genus Eucalyptus contains over 700 described species, plus an additional 100 or so in the closely related genera Corymbia and Angophora, collectively known as eucalypts. They range from towering mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans), the tallest flowering plant on earth at over 100 meters, to mallee species barely 3 meters tall that grow as multi-stemmed shrubs in semi-arid scrubland. Eucalypts dominate every major ecosystem in Australia — tropical rainforest margins, temperate forests, alpine woodlands, coastal heathlands, and arid scrublands — and each ecosystem has its own suite of locally adapted species.

This diversity matters enormously because the problems associated with eucalyptus plantations elsewhere in the world almost always involve a tiny handful of species — principally Eucalyptus globulus (Tasmanian blue gum), E. camaldulensis (river red gum), and E. grandis — planted as monocultures far outside their natural range. Judging the entire genus by these plantation species is like judging all grasses by industrial maize. The ecological story of eucalyptus is far more nuanced than the plantation debate suggests, and understanding that nuance is essential for anyone involved in restoration or land management.

Within Australia, eucalypts occupy niches from sea level to the snowline, from annual rainfall of 150 millimeters to over 3,000 millimeters. Some species tolerate salt spray, others grow in permanently waterlogged soil, others survive prolonged drought on skeletal rocky soils. This adaptive radiation over 50 million years of Australian isolation has produced a genus of extraordinary ecological breadth — and explains why eucalypts, when taken out of their native context, can be so disruptive: the traits that make them supremely successful in Australia do not always play well in ecosystems that evolved without them.

Keystone Role in Australian Ecosystems

In Australia, eucalypts are not merely common trees — they are the structural and functional foundation of most terrestrial ecosystems. Koalas feed exclusively on the leaves of a few eucalyptus species. Sugar gliders and yellow-bellied gliders feed on eucalyptus sap. Dozens of species of cockatoos, parrots, and lorikeets depend on eucalyptus flowers for nectar and on eucalyptus hollows for nesting. Powerful owls, kookaburras, and dozens of other bird species nest in the large tree hollows that develop in mature eucalypts — hollows that take 100 to 200 years to form and cannot be replicated by any other tree genus in the Australian landscape.

The relationship with fire is equally fundamental. Most eucalyptus species are not merely fire-tolerant but fire-adapted — and some are actively fire-promoting. The oily leaves and peeling bark create fuel loads that carry fire through the canopy, and the trees have evolved multiple strategies to survive and exploit it. Epicormic buds beneath the bark sprout vigorously after fire, re-leafing the tree within weeks. Lignotubers — massive underground woody storage organs — allow mallees and some tree species to resprout from the base even after complete crown destruction. Some species have serotinous capsules that release seeds only after fire, timing germination to the flush of post-fire nutrients and open sunlight.

This fire ecology creates a positive feedback loop: eucalyptus forests burn, eucalypts survive and regenerate, competing species that lack fire adaptations are suppressed, and eucalypts maintain their dominance. It is a system that has functioned for millions of years and supports the full suite of Australian biodiversity that depends on it. Removing eucalypts from the Australian landscape — through land clearing, altered fire regimes, or Phytophthora dieback disease — triggers cascading declines in the wildlife that depends on them, from canopy to soil. Australian restoration projects that plant eucalypts are not creating plantations; they are rebuilding the keystone structure of a continental ecosystem.

The Controversy Outside Australia

Outside Australia, eucalyptus tells a different story. Beginning in the mid-19th century, a handful of fast-growing species — particularly E. globulus and E. grandis — were planted as commercial monocultures across southern Europe, South America, sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia. The appeal was obvious: growth rates of 20 to 30 cubic meters of wood per hectare per year, straight trunks ideal for pulp, paper, and construction timber, and the ability to grow on marginal land with minimal management. By the late 20th century, eucalyptus plantations covered over 20 million hectares worldwide.

The ecological consequences have been significant. Eucalyptus monocultures support dramatically less biodiversity than the native vegetation they replace. The trees consume large volumes of water — a mature E. globulus can transpire over 100 liters per day — and plantations established on former grassland or native forest have measurably lowered water tables and reduced stream flow in regions from Portugal to South Africa to India. Eucalyptus leaf litter decomposes slowly outside Australia because the fungal and invertebrate decomposers that coevolved with it are absent, leading to accumulation of undecomposed litter that suppresses ground flora. Allelopathic compounds in eucalyptus leaves and root exudates further inhibit the germination and growth of many understory species.

The fire risk is also real. In Mediterranean climates — Portugal, Greece, California, Chile — eucalyptus plantations have been implicated in catastrophic wildfire events. The 2017 fires in Portugal, which killed over 100 people, burned disproportionately through eucalyptus plantations, where the volatile oils and peeling bark that serve an ecological function in Australia become a dangerous fire accelerant in landscapes not adapted to the same fire regime. This has led to growing calls for restrictions on eucalyptus planting in fire-prone Mediterranean regions and a shift toward native species for reforestation.

Right Species, Right Place, Mixed Plantings

The responsible way to think about eucalyptus is not "good tree" or "bad tree" but "right context or wrong context." Within Australia, eucalyptus planting for restoration is not only appropriate but essential — the question is which species, matched to which soil, rainfall, and ecosystem type. A snow gum (E. pauciflora) belongs in alpine woodland, not on a coastal plain. A river red gum belongs along a waterway, not on a dry ridge. Matching species to site is the fundamental principle of all restoration design, and with 700 species to choose from, the eucalyptus genus offers extraordinary precision of fit within its native continent.

Outside Australia, the case for eucalyptus is narrower but not nonexistent. In agroforestry systems where fast-growing windbreaks, shade trees, or biomass crops are needed, selected eucalyptus species planted as components of mixed systems — not monocultures — can fill specific functional roles without the ecological damage of plantation forestry. The key conditions are: mixed planting with locally native species, not monoculture; selection of species appropriate to the local climate and water availability; ongoing management to prevent escape and naturalisation; and honest assessment of the water budget, particularly in water-limited landscapes.

Some restoration practitioners in the tropics use eucalyptus as a short-rotation pioneer species — growing it for 5 to 10 years to produce timber and biomass income while native species establish beneath or alongside it, then removing the eucalyptus as the native canopy closes. This pragmatic approach acknowledges that restoration projects often need to generate revenue to be financially sustainable, and that a fast-growing timber crop can fund the establishment of a diverse native forest that would otherwise be unaffordable. The ethical line is between this kind of transitional use — eucalyptus in service of native forest — and industrial monoculture that replaces native ecosystems permanently.

See Also

eucalyptusAustraliafire ecologyplantation controversy